Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: review: More frame options in window functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: More frame options in window functions
Date: 2010-01-16 12:26:30
Message-ID: 162867791001160426j38774169s87a955f452041fef@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/1/16 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2010/1/16 Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>:
>>
>>> Thanks for the review. I've found another crash today and attached is
>>> fixed version. The case is:
>>>
>>> SELECT four, sum(ten) over (PARTITION BY four ORDER BY four RANGE 1
>>> PRECEDING) FROM tenk1 WHERE unique1 < 10;
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch (more_frame_options.20100115.patch.gz) applies cleanly, but the regression test gives:

on fedora 32 bit is all ok. I'll check it on 64bit fedora on Monday.

Regards
Pavel

>
> It doesn't happen here. Could you send more information like configure
> options and EXPLAIN output of that query?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Hitoshi Harada
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-16 12:39:50
Subject: Re: attoptions
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-16 11:32:35
Subject: Re: Small locking bugs in hs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group