2009/7/29 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Pavel Stehule<pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 2009/7/29 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> I would to solve some points from ToDo. I began with TYPE  support.
>>> plpgsql's %type support is a crock that's going to have to be rewritten
>>> from the ground up as soon as we consolidate the lexer with the core.
>>> I wouldn't suggest spending any time in that area now.
> There's also the fact that we still have almost half the patches in
> this CommitFest that have yet to be closed out. If you're looking for
> something to do....
I am bad man for review and I understand little bit only to plpgsql. I
am preparing plan for next commitfest.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2009-07-29 15:30:08|
|Subject: Re: plpgsql: support identif%TYPE, (from ToDo)|
|Previous:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2009-07-29 15:15:30|
|Subject: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type|