| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Atul Chojar <achojar(at)airfacts(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Li <lilian(dot)ying(at)airfacts(dot)com>, Andy Yoder <ayoder(at)airfacts(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ??? |
| Date: | 2009-06-11 04:48:57 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790906102148s70b07c24tb18e5660686f3be@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Hello
2009/6/10 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "Atul Chojar" <achojar(at)airfacts(dot)com> writes:
>> So in 8.3.7, the incrementing of the for-loop variable "idx" is being
>> ignored; that is not the case in 8.2.7. Is this a new feature of 8.3.7 or a
>> bug?
>
> It's the new implementation. Depending on unspecified implementation
> details is a good way to have broken code.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
we should to mark control varables as read-only?
regards
Pavel Stehule
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-06-11 05:40:58 | Re: HW recommendatons |
| Previous Message | Kevin Kempter | 2009-06-11 00:19:04 | HW recommendatons |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Cheselka | 2009-06-11 04:49:26 | Re: [GENERAL] "Rails and PostgreSQL" now up on media.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-06-11 04:38:11 | Re: [GENERAL] "Rails and PostgreSQL" now up on media.postgresql.org |