2008/6/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 2008/6/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>> Huh? That's completely nonsensical ... where will you determine the
>>> type of the array, if you don't have a sample element?
>> it is nonsens in current postgres. But null array is castable to anyarray no?
> If you mean an array of nulls, it still has to have an element type.
I know it - but there was discus about untyped array for empty arrays
it is little bit similar
> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2008-06-04 20:36:35|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: new function array_init|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-04 20:33:20|
|Subject: Re: Change lock requirements for adding a trigger |