| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: new function array_init |
| Date: | 2008-06-04 12:57:38 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790806040557k54f910e5ya632fdb244ab490f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/6/4 Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>:
> On Jun 2, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> * Should the fill value be the first parameter instead of the last?
>
>
> +1. The other way just seems weird, at least to me.
can you write reason?
I put fill value on end, because it is like default value:
array_set(array[2,2]);
array_set(array[2,2], 0);
array_set(array[2,2],array[1,1]);
array_set(array[2,2],array[1,1], 0); - and it's analogy to memset fce
etc set(where, value);
Pavel
> --
> Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
> Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Decibel! | 2008-06-04 13:00:49 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2008-06-04 12:44:53 | Re: Proposal: new function array_init |