>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
TL> I was just bugging Marc for some useful data, so I'll ask you too:
TL> could you provide a trace of the pg_restore execution? log_statement
TL> plus log_duration output would do it. I am curious to understand
TL> exactly which steps in the restore are significant time sinks.
Sure... machine isn't gonna do much of anything until 7.4 is released
(or I hear a promise of no more dump/reload).
>> I notice during the restore that the disk throughput triples during
>> the checkpoint.
TL> Hm, better make sure the log includes some indication of when
TL> checkpoints happen.
That it does.
I'll post the results in the next couple of days, as each run takes
about 4 hours ;-)
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-09-16 14:05:06|
|Subject: Re: Attempt at work around of int4 query won't touch int8 index ... |
|Previous:||From: Matt Clark||Date: 2003-09-16 08:31:01|
|Subject: Re: Inconsistent performance|