Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)
Date: 2008-06-28 02:34:26
Message-ID: 16171.1214620466@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Is there an easy way for an Admin clean-up the lost temp tables that 
> autovacuum is complaining about?  It seems like it could be along time 
> and a lot of log messages between when they are first orphaned and and 
> finally dropped due to anti-wraparound protection.

Drop the particular temp schema, maybe?  The log message should probably
make sure to specify the schema name.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-28 03:14:36
Subject: Re: the un-vacuumable table
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2008-06-28 01:22:25
Subject: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group