From: | Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de |
Subject: | Re: Which perl5 Pg to use? Who maintains it? |
Date: | 2002-01-21 00:51:11 |
Message-ID: | 160970000.1011574271@palle.girgensohn.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
--On Sunday, January 20, 2002 19:36:41 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> writes:
>> Maybe someone can shed some light on this?
>
> Edmund Mergl doesn't talk to us much :-(
:(
>> As postgres code is in freeze
>> now, will the version on CPAN synchronize?
>
> We are not holding up 7.2 release to make that happen.
Well, I really ment the other way around; that the version on CPAN should
synchronize. The 1.9.0 (on CPAN) is from Apr 2000, and I honestly think the
postgresql version is more fresh and up-to-date, but there are no cvs
comments in the postgresql repository about "importing 1.9.0"...
> It'd be good if
> Mergl sent us some updates, but at this point they'd be going into 7.3.
Well, they're free to fetch on CPAN, but as I said, I believe they're more
out-of-date than the stuff in src/interfaces/perl5. Bruce has touched most
of the files there within the last six months.
Regards,
Palle
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jtv | 2002-01-21 12:04:25 | Re: libpq++ |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-21 00:36:41 | Re: Which perl5 Pg to use? Who maintains it? |