Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Which perl5 Pg to use? Who maintains it?

From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de
Subject: Re: Which perl5 Pg to use? Who maintains it?
Date: 2002-01-21 00:51:11
Message-ID: 160970000.1011574271@palle.girgensohn.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
--On Sunday, January 20, 2002 19:36:41 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> 
wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> writes:
>> Maybe someone can shed some light on this?
>
> Edmund Mergl doesn't talk to us much :-(

:(

>> As postgres code is in freeze
>> now, will the version on CPAN synchronize?
>
> We are not holding up 7.2 release to make that happen.

Well, I really ment the other way around; that the version on CPAN should 
synchronize. The 1.9.0 (on CPAN) is from Apr 2000, and I honestly think the 
postgresql version is more fresh and up-to-date, but there are no cvs 
comments in the postgresql repository about "importing 1.9.0"...

> It'd be good if
> Mergl sent us some updates, but at this point they'd be going into 7.3.

Well, they're free to fetch on CPAN, but as I said, I believe they're more 
out-of-date than the stuff in src/interfaces/perl5. Bruce has touched most 
of the files there within the last six months.

Regards,
Palle


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: jtvDate: 2002-01-21 12:04:25
Subject: Re: libpq++
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-01-21 00:36:41
Subject: Re: Which perl5 Pg to use? Who maintains it?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group