Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_restore -t table concerns

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Toews <mwtoews(at)sfu(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore -t table concerns
Date: 2009-06-29 17:25:03
Message-ID: 16039.1246296303@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Mike Toews <mwtoews(at)sfu(dot)ca> writes:
> I have a few concerns with the usability and documentation for 
> pg_restore (note: I'm on 8.3, but I've checked the documentation for 8.4).

There's a TODO item about that already...

* Add support for multiple pg_restore -t options, like pg_dump

	pg_restore's -t switch is less useful than pg_dump's in quite a
	few ways: no multiple switches, no pattern matching, no ability
	to pick up indexes and other dependent items for a selected
	table. It should be made to handle this switch just like pg_dump
	does.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-06-29 17:27:14
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-06-29 17:19:56
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group