Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2
Date: 2005-08-30 01:41:32
Message-ID: 16013.1125366092@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
> Yes - it's very strange, I've had the same experience though I finally found
> that setting SHMMAX and SHMALL to the same values, namely 268435456, seems
> to work out fine.

Interesting.  I wonder if there's some bit of code that thinks that
SHMALL is measured in bytes (contrary to OSX's general convention
that it's measured in pages).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff -Date: 2005-08-30 02:14:37
Subject: Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-08-30 01:24:01
Subject: Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group