From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Date: | 2010-07-02 17:18:36 |
Message-ID: | 15994.1278091116@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue jul 01 21:52:00 -0400 2010:
>> Is there something that makes installing dia more challenging than the
>> other documentation build tools?
> Err, I dunno -- it's just an apt-get away for me, but what will Tom say
> when it doesn't work on his ancient HP-UX 10.20 system?
I don't try to build the docs on that box anyway --- it does have
openjade but such an old version that they don't build. In practice
building the docs already takes much more modern infrastructure than
compiling the source code; and besides there are many fewer people
who care about doing it.
A more interesting question is whether Marc can install a working
version of dia on whatever he uses to wrap the tarballs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-07-02 18:22:21 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-07-02 16:35:45 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |