Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Date: 2009-06-29 17:19:56
Message-ID: 15934.1246295996@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Can you refer me to a general prospective-permissions scheme that is
> more widely accepted?

Well, the point of my post was that nothing's gotten to the point of
being "widely accepted".  But there are people working on a "default
ACLs" scheme that would cover some of that territory.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/DefaultACL

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-06-29 17:25:03
Subject: Re: pg_restore -t table concerns
Previous:From: Mike ToewsDate: 2009-06-29 17:18:29
Subject: pg_restore -t table concerns

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group