Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> That is exactly what I think is "to big a promise" - I don't think we
> can actually guarantee that this will fix the dump/restore issue (well
> the dump might load but say the 30000 lines of plpgsql using dynamic SQL
> will still be broken).
Yeah, that's a mighty good point. We are certainly not going to try to
fix the contents of function bodies. The only things we could possibly
fix that we don't handle today (when using the newer pg_dump) are
references in views, check constraint expressions, etc.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-06-10 14:34:35|
|Subject: Re: Beta 2 build issue |
|Previous:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2010-06-10 14:27:51|
|Subject: Beta 2 build issue|