Re: Continuent (was: Postgres Clustering)

From: Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel <flavio(at)4linux(dot)com(dot)br>
To: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Continuent (was: Postgres Clustering)
Date: 2009-05-29 00:26:32
Message-ID: 15890762.21243556788315.JavaMail.flavio@presente
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

----- "Alan McKay" <alan(dot)mckay(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:
> Hmmm. Anyone out there have the Continuent solution working with PostgreSQL?
> If so, what release? We're at 8.3 right now.

I have tested Sequoia 2.10.10 with a high transaction rate database with good servers and plenty of memory. Since that's a OLTP system the performance droped to as low as 30%.

I can't recomend their solution for a OLAP system because I never tested in this situation.

Configuration of Sequoia is quite complicated and I think a very good Database Administrator is needed to keep it working correctly and nodes syncronized.
Sequoia also is very complicated to run ddl and dml scripts since your scrips should be written for Sequoia, not for PostgreSQL.

If log-shipping works for you, try Slony. Your slaves can serve as read-only databases and you can distribute some load.

Flavio

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rory Campbell-Lange 2009-05-29 00:36:10 Debugging pgsql function date error
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2009-05-29 00:19:08 Re: Pl/java in 8.4 bet1 sources compilation failed

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel 2009-05-29 00:35:12 Re: Scalability in postgres
Previous Message Anne Rosset 2009-05-28 22:46:43 Unexpected query plan results