"A.M." <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> writes:
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
>> I'm simply suggesting that for additional benefits it may be worth
>> thinking about getting around nattach and thus SysV shmem, especially
>> with regard to safety, in an open-ended way.
> I solved this via fcntl locking.
No, you didn't, because fcntl locks aren't inherited by child processes.
Too bad, because they'd be a great solution otherwise.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2012-06-27 00:13:18|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] Introduce the ApplyCache module which can reassemble transactions from a stream of interspersed changes|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2012-06-26 23:26:00|
|Subject: embedded list v2|