Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?
Date: 2007-03-01 05:50:58
Message-ID: 15866.1172728258@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I've disabled packed varlenas for user-defined data types and find tsearch2
> and _int still fail. tsearch2 requires the small patch attached. _int seems to
> be unrelated.

As of when? I committed fixes earlier tonight that seem to handle the
case of VARSIZE-is-ntohl.

The patch you suggest is orthogonal to what I did; it looks like it
might be right, but regression passes without it, so what was your test
case that led you to it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-03-01 06:05:50 Re: POSTGRES WAL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-01 05:45:54 Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?