Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?
Date: 2007-03-01 05:50:58
Message-ID: 15866.1172728258@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I've disabled packed varlenas for user-defined data types and find tsearch2
> and _int still fail. tsearch2 requires the small patch attached. _int seems to
> be unrelated.

As of when?  I committed fixes earlier tonight that seem to handle the
case of VARSIZE-is-ntohl.

The patch you suggest is orthogonal to what I did; it looks like it
might be right, but regression passes without it, so what was your test
case that led you to it?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2007-03-01 06:05:50
Subject: Re: POSTGRES WAL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-01 05:45:54
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group