Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I've disabled packed varlenas for user-defined data types and find tsearch2
> and _int still fail. tsearch2 requires the small patch attached. _int seems to
> be unrelated.

As of when?  I committed fixes earlier tonight that seem to handle the
case of VARSIZE-is-ntohl.

The patch you suggest is orthogonal to what I did; it looks like it
might be right, but regression passes without it, so what was your test
case that led you to it?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? at 2007-03-01 04:33:40 from Gregory Stark

Responses

• Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? at 2007-03-01 09:15:04 from Gregory Stark

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2007-03-01 06:05:50
	Subject: Re: POSTGRES WAL
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-03-01 05:45:54
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?