Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch queue concern

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern
Date: 2007-03-29 05:34:04
Message-ID: 15850.1175146444@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> My feeling is we should have more regular sync points where the patch
> queue is emptied and everything committed or rejected.

No doubt, but the real problem here is that reviewing/committing other
people's patches is not fun, it's just work :-(.  So it's no surprise
that it tends to get put off.  Not sure what to do about that.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Koichi SuzukiDate: 2007-03-29 08:50:03
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update
Previous:From: Pavan DeolaseeDate: 2007-03-29 03:30:24
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group