Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-02-25 05:38:29
Message-ID: 15849.1014615509@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> AFAIK, no effort is made to ensure that dump files produced by a current
> version of pg_dump will restore properly into older databases.

No, but gratuitous breakage should be avoided --- especially when it's
in pursuit of a goal that no one except Bruce subscribes to in the
first place ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Janardhana ReddyDate: 2002-02-25 07:11:32
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-25 05:35:02
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Paul EggertDate: 2002-02-25 07:07:01
Subject: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-25 05:35:02
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group