Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Date: 2003-01-30 06:04:52
Message-ID: 15841.1043906692@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'???

I'd lean towards allowing the existing inet and cidr types to store both
v4 and v6 addresses, if at all possible.  Is there a good motivation for
doing otherwise?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus Naeslund(f)Date: 2003-01-30 06:12:57
Subject: Re: v7.2.4 bundled ...
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-01-30 06:01:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2003-01-30 12:42:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-01-30 06:01:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group