Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ProcessUtility_hook

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
Date: 2009-12-01 01:38:18
Message-ID: 15794.1259631498@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh, we weren't even done reviewing this were we?

> Uh, I am new to this commitfest wiki thing, but it did have a review by
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira:
> 	https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=196
> and the author replied.  Is there more that needs to be done?

It wasn't marked Ready For Committer, so presumably the reviewer
wasn't done with it.  I know I hadn't looked at it at all, because
I was waiting for the commitfest review process to finish.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-12-01 01:55:38
Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-12-01 01:35:27
Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group