Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think we need to either (1) fix the bugs and update the
>> documentation to remove the statement that this will be removed or (2)
>> actually remove it.
> I agree it's a mess but I don't think just abandoning the functionality
> is a good idea.
Yeah, we can't really remove it until we have a plausible substitute for
the xpath_table functionality. This is in the TODO list ...
regards, tom lane