Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Thanks. This seems odd though, since it appears to level out at
>> something above 4K TPM. Your previous run
>> shows it dropping to 3500 or so. What changed?
> Other than pulling from CVS at a different time, it should all be
> the same parameters, etc.
Hmph. The truth is probably somewhere in between these two curves.
But in any case, I think we can make the conclusion we wanted to
make: 2Q isn't seriously worse than ARC. Since this is a dead line
of development anyway in view of the early results with the clock
sweep algorithm, I don't think there's any need to spend more time
measuring the differences carefully.
I'll go ahead and apply the 2Q patch to the 8.0 branch, unless there
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-03-03 01:55:31|
|Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
|Previous:||From: Qu Tianlian||Date: 2005-03-03 01:23:05|
|Subject: hi all|