From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Date: | 2003-01-30 05:55:30 |
Message-ID: | 15758.1043906130@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Linux.conf.au Report
> [ much snipped ]
> * IPV6 data types
> - Apparently there are some ISPs in some countries that have started to bill
> people for IPV6 bandwidth, and the lack of IPV6 address types is hurting
> them.
Yeah. This is a pretty self-contained problem, it just needs someone
who's motivated to work on it. Mostly what we need is to understand how
we want to extend the previously-agreed-to I/O behaviors for IPv4 inet
and cidr types into the v6 domain. (Or should we back up and ask if the
inet/cidr division still makes sense in the v6 world? I hope so, but
if not we should face up to it...)
> ... Maybe we should
> chase some people for case studies?
U betcha ... we were just getting pestered for more of those ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-01-30 06:01:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-30 03:52:46 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-01-30 06:01:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2003-01-30 05:29:04 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |