Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable

From: "Reini Urban" <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
To: <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
Subject: Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable
Date: 2005-03-29 12:29:43
Message-ID: 157.247.252.11.1112099383.wm@webmail.inode.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>>What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin
>>> installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing.  If
>>> nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platform
>>> changes account for the regression.
>>
>>Sounds that way to me too, but it's disturbing.  One would say they
>> broke their scheduler :-(.  Possibly you should try to stir up some
>> interest among the Cygwin hackers in looking into this.
>>
>
> I'd like somebody else to report the same phenomenon first. Reini?

Why plperl is broken I cannot say yet.

I still have the same general IPC permission problem since about beta3.
Only very few cygwin hackers have this also.
I only got confirmation that the problem is in postgresql, not in cygwin.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-03-29 12:49:36
Subject: Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-03-29 11:55:55
Subject: Re: Executing Anonymous Blocks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group