> Tom Lane wrote:
>>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>>What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin
>>> installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing. If
>>> nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platform
>>> changes account for the regression.
>>Sounds that way to me too, but it's disturbing. One would say they
>> broke their scheduler :-(. Possibly you should try to stir up some
>> interest among the Cygwin hackers in looking into this.
> I'd like somebody else to report the same phenomenon first. Reini?
Why plperl is broken I cannot say yet.
I still have the same general IPC permission problem since about beta3.
Only very few cygwin hackers have this also.
I only got confirmation that the problem is in postgresql, not in cygwin.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2005-03-29 12:49:36|
|Subject: Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2005-03-29 11:55:55|
|Subject: Re: Executing Anonymous Blocks|