Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date: 2008-05-23 13:20:21
Message-ID: 15673.1211548821@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Any word on 8.3.2 ?

Obviously, nothing is happening during PGCon ;-)

There was some discussion a week or so back about scheduling a set of
releases in early June, but it's not formally decided.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gurjeet SinghDate: 2008-05-23 16:20:24
Subject: Random order of archiving files
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2008-05-23 12:48:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error while executing pg_dump "invalid memory alloc request size 4294967293"

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Dave CramerDate: 2008-05-28 12:25:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2008-05-23 10:20:45
Subject: Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group