From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |
Date: | 2009-09-30 15:36:40 |
Message-ID: | 15654.1254325000@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> OTOH, I'd hate to hold the commitfest hostage for that. Perhaps it
> should be returned to author at this point, I should move on to other
> patches to get the commitfest closed ASAP, and continue reviewing and
> polishing that right after the commitfest.
FWIW, I'd rather you kept focusing on those two patches while other
committers work on the rest. From what I've seen you're finding a
whole lot of broken or at least questionable stuff, and even if they're
individually minor issues, that adds up to a lot of instability.
I agree that these patches need special attention and should not be
treated exactly the same as we'd treat smaller patches.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-09-30 15:45:49 | Re: Hot Standby on git |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-30 15:19:35 | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |