Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date: 2008-01-28 00:37:42
Message-ID: 15573.1201480662@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.

The name is still open for discussion --- it's an easy
search-and-replace in the patch ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-28 01:09:10
Subject: SSL connections don't cope with server crash very well at all
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-28 00:00:41
Subject: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-01-28 01:34:27
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Previous:From: Gevik BabakhaniDate: 2008-01-27 23:09:51
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group