Marc G. Fournier writes:
> Myself, I wonder why Oracle went the route they went ... does anyone have
> access to a Sybase / Informix system, to confirm how they do it? Is
> Oracle the 'odd man out', or are we going to be that? *Adding* something
> (ie. DROP TABLE rollbacks) that nobody appears to have is one thing ...
> but changing the behaviour is a totally different ..
FWIW, Ingres also doesn't rollback SET. However all its SET
functionality is the sort of stuff you wouldn't assume to rollback:
You cannot do something sane like modify the date output through SET.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2002-04-26 11:33:30|
|Subject: Re: WAL -> Replication|
|Previous:||From: Shad||Date: 2002-04-26 08:37:50|
|Subject: PSQL \x \l command issues|