Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Possible bug in date(timestamptz)?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in date(timestamptz)?
Date: 2003-03-27 19:34:50
Message-ID: 15538.1048793690@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
> I can't think why one would be immutable and the other not,

You aren't thinking hard enough, then :-(

date(timestamptz) depends on the TimeZone setting, the other does not.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tad MarkoDate: 2003-03-27 19:43:10
Subject: Data conversion in query
Previous:From: Vilson fariasDate: 2003-03-27 18:33:53
Subject: DeleteTransactionInProgress

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group