Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de>,markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-29 17:16:05
Message-ID: 15535.1091121365@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Now, if you say people will rarely turn archiving on/off, then one
> parameter seems to make more sense.

I really can't envision a situation where people would do that.  If you
need PITR at all then you need it 24x7.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-29 17:33:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-29 17:07:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-29 17:33:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-29 17:07:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-29 17:25:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] win32 crash in initdb
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-29 17:12:14
Subject: Re: Admin functions contrib

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group