Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?
Date: 2001-01-06 00:47:39
Message-ID: 15520.978742059@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK.  Second proposal: do the init_irels() call in
>> RelationCacheInitializePhase2().  I've just looked through the
>> other stuff that's done in between, and I don't think any of it
>> needs valid relcache entries.

> Oops, I neglected to reply "agreed", sorry.
> It would be much safer for init_irels() to be called
> in a proper transaction than the current implementation.

Fine.  Were you going to do it, or do you want me to?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ross J. ReedstromDate: 2001-01-06 00:48:10
Subject: Re: bootstrap tables
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-01-06 00:33:34
Subject: Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group