Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64

From: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(dot)berkus(at)sun(dot)com, robert(dot)lor(at)sun(dot)com
Subject: Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
Date: 2006-04-20 03:33:11
Message-ID: 154BA792-BB51-4F85-86E3-0BBAEB732C33@omniti.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches


On Apr 19, 2006, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
>>
>> The following bug has been logged online:
>>
>> Bug reference: 2401
>> Logged by: Theo Schlossnagle
>> Email address: jesus(at)omniti(dot)com
>> PostgreSQL version: 8.1.3
>> Operating system: Solaris 10
>> Description: spinlocks not available on amd64
>> Details:
>>
>> Compiling 8.1.3 on solaris 10 x86 with Sun Studio 11 for amd64 target
>> architecture leads us to an error resulting from no available "tas"
>> assembly.
>>
>> The tas.s file doesn't look like valid assembly for the shipped Sun
>> assembler.
>
> Yes. We will have a fix for it in 8.2, but it was too risky for
> 8.1.X.
> You can try a snapshot tarball from our FTP server and see if that
> works.

I reviewed the code there. I think it can be better. The issue is
that s_lock chooses to implement the lock in an unsigned char which
isn't optimal on sparc or x86. An over arching issue is that the tas
instruction is a less functional cas function, so it seems that the
tas should be cas and the spinlocks should be implemented that way.
By using cas, you can can actually know the locker by cas'ing the
lock to the process id instead of 1 -- we use that trick to see who
is holding the spinlock between threads (we obviously use thread ids
in that case).

So... I changed the s_lock.h to merge the sparc and x86 sections thusly:

-------------
#if defined(__sun) && (defined(__i386) || defined(__amd64) || defined
(__sparc) |
| defined(__sparc__))
/*
* Solaris/386 (we only get here for non-gcc case)
*/
#define HAS_TEST_AND_SET
typedef unsigned int slock_t;

extern volatile slock_t
pg_atomic_cas(volatile slock_t *lock, slock_t with, slock_t cmp);

#define TAS(a) (pg_atomic_cas((a), 1, 0) != 0)

#endif
-------------

And then replaced solaris_sparc.s and solaris_i386.s (BTW there is no
reason to have these files seprately as you can #ifdef them correctly
in the assembly -- I didn't do that as I didn't want to disturb the
make system).

solaris_sparc.s
-------------
/
========================================================================
=====
/ tas.s -- compare and swap for solaris_sparc
/
========================================================================
=====

#if defined(__sparcv9) || defined(__sparc)

.section ".text"
.align 8
.skip 24
.align 4

.global pg_atomic_cas
pg_atomic_cas:
cas [%o0],%o2,%o1
mov %o1,%o0
retl
nop
.type pg_atomic_cas,2
.size pg_atomic_cas,(.-pg_atomic_cas)
#endif
-------------

solaris_i386.s
-------------
/
========================================================================
=====
/ tas.s -- compare and swap for solaris_i386
/
========================================================================
=====

.file "tas.s"

#if defined(__amd64)
.code64
#endif

.globl pg_atomic_cas
.type pg_atomic_cas, @function

.section .text, "ax"
.align 16
pg_atomic_cas:
#if defined(__amd64)
movl %edx,%eax
lock
cmpxchgl %esi,(%rdi)
#else
movl 4(%esp), %edx
movl 8(%esp), %ecx
movl 12(%esp), %eax
lock
cmpxchgl %ecx, (%edx)
#endif
ret
.size pg_atomic_cas, . - pg_atomic_cas
-------------

// Theo Schlossnagle
// CTO -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
// OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/
// Ecelerity: Run with it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Zerolo 2006-04-20 04:40:58 Re: BUG #2400: 'Ã
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-20 03:17:51 Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-04-20 07:07:17 Re: [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-20 03:17:51 Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64