| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE EXTENSION BLOCKS |
| Date: | 2013-04-03 16:01:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1549E73B-8ABA-44BF-987F-2D685FF8F9D3@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 3, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> I'd expect one of the CREATE EXTENSION commands to succeed
> and the others to block until the transaction is committed,
> then to fail with 'extension "oracle_fdw" already exists'.
>
> If that is what happens, it's what I'd expect since
> extension names are unique (see the unique constraint on
> pg_extension).
Oh, they are not unique per-schema? I guess they are global to the database but then their objects are in the specified schema, then.
Thanks,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-04-03 16:09:01 | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-03 16:00:02 | track_activities is mostly broken |