Vince Vielhaber writes:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Dominic J. Eidson wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Lee Kindness wrote:
> > > On a slightly related note, and just as whimsical nature...
> > > I've often wondered now many people actual say the name 'PostgreSQL',
> > > I mean it flows off the tongue so easily! Whereas 'Postgres' is 100
> > > times simpler...
> > As much as I get really bored when this comes up time after time..
> > "post-gre-sql" (And no, SQL's not pronounced sequel)
> The proper pronunciation is on the PostgreSQL home page in mp3 and
> wav formats. The above implies that the second sylable is pronounced
> with a long e which is incorrect.
I know how it's pronounced, I never said anything to the contrary! The
actual fact that there is a need for the pronunciation on the webpage
hints at my point - it's a real mouthful!
And as I said this was a 'whimsical' post - I don't really care either
way what the name is... But i'm sure most people shorten it to
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2002-02-21 16:42:48|
|Subject: Re: elog() proposal|
|Previous:||From: Dominic J. Eidson||Date: 2002-02-21 16:34:13|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??|