| From: | Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Colin Faber <cfaber(at)fpsn(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |
| Date: | 2002-02-21 15:53:04 |
| Message-ID: | 15477.6112.480766.112804@kelvin.csl.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On a slightly related note, and just as whimsical nature...
I've often wondered now many people actual say the name 'PostgreSQL',
I mean it flows off the tongue so easily! Whereas 'Postgres' is 100
times simpler...
Lee.
Colin Faber writes:
> Personally, I have to agree with Tom,
>
> Silly versioning like that is for marketing teams and microsoft ;-)
>
> <sarcasm>How about the next version be released as PostgreSQL
> XP</sarcasm>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > > Doesn't this seem like postgresql 8.0, rather than 7.3?
> >
> > It took us five years to go from 6.0 to 7.0 ... I don't think we
> > need talk about 8.0 for awhile yet.
> >
> > I'm not in favor of arbitrary "release number inflation". A release
> > is a release, whatever you call it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dominic J. Eidson | 2002-02-21 16:16:35 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-02-21 15:47:56 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |