Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: mike <mike(at)neutrinostudios(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?
Date: 2001-01-06 00:17:24
Message-ID: 15455.978740244@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> Ok, consider my mind changed. :-). My only concerns were, due to some
> feedback I have gotten, is that people would treat the RPM release as
> _productions_ rather than beta -- but maybe I'm just being paranoid.

As long as the RPMs are clearly marked beta, I don't have a lot of
sympathy for anyone who thinks beta == production.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfonso Peniche 2001-01-06 00:18:48 ODBC 7.x for windows
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-01-06 00:02:52 Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?