Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: mike <mike(at)neutrinostudios(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?
Date: 2001-01-06 00:17:24
Message-ID: 15455.978740244@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> Ok, consider my mind changed. :-).  My only concerns were, due to some
> feedback I have gotten, is that people would treat the RPM release as
> _productions_ rather than beta -- but maybe I'm just being paranoid. 

As long as the RPMs are clearly marked beta, I don't have a lot of
sympathy for anyone who thinks beta == production.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alfonso PenicheDate: 2001-01-06 00:18:48
Subject: ODBC 7.x for windows
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2001-01-06 00:02:52
Subject: Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group