Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: As long as we're forcing an ORDER BY in

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: As long as we're forcing an ORDER BY in
Date: 2004-12-03 22:53:36
Message-ID: 15450.1102114416@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Just as an FYI ... this commit made it into RC1 ... anything after this 
> won't unless I re-tag/package ...

That's fine.  I'm going to look at Kris Shannon's assert failure on
trying to cast one composite type to another, but I don't feel a
compelling need to have the fix in RC1.  ("There's always another bug.")

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: User NickgDate: 2004-12-04 02:06:02
Subject: press - pr: Phrasing corrections from Oleg
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-12-03 22:29:41
Subject: Re: pgsql: As long as we're forcing an ORDER BY in

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group