Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ODBC Rewrite

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC Rewrite
Date: 2004-12-07 15:32:25
Message-ID: 15393.1102433545@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> That's not particularly relevant- the question is if the existing libpq
> API is sufficient for the ODBC driver or not.

And even more to the point, whether extending it wouldn't be a better
answer than writing a whole new API (and new library?).  There are
definitely features of the V3 protocol that are not accessible through
libpq at the moment, but that is due to lack of time to add appropriate
API to libpq, not any fundamental objection to extending libpq.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: markwDate: 2004-12-07 15:56:30
Subject: Re: ODBC Rewrite
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2004-12-07 15:02:14
Subject: Re: ODBC Rewrite

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group