Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: GIST and TOAST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GIST and TOAST
Date: 2007-03-02 18:49:14
Message-ID: 15391.1172861354@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> On 2007-03-02, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think these are actual bugs. If you happened to provide a large enough datum
>> to the gist code it would cause the same problem I'm seeing. The packed
>> varlena patch just makes it easier to trigger.

> Are you taking into account the fact that, at least prior to your patch,
> values in index tuples could never be toasted?

False --- see index_form_tuple().

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-02 18:51:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2007-03-02 18:47:21
Subject: Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group