Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> On 2007-03-02, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think these are actual bugs. If you happened to provide a large enough datum
>> to the gist code it would cause the same problem I'm seeing. The packed
>> varlena patch just makes it easier to trigger.

> Are you taking into account the fact that, at least prior to your patch,
> values in index tuples could never be toasted?

False --- see index_form_tuple().

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: GIST and TOAST at 2007-03-02 18:41:08 from Andrew - Supernews

Responses

• Re: GIST and TOAST at 2007-03-02 19:28:44 from Andrew - Supernews

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-03-02 18:51:32
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous:	From: Bruno Wolff III	Date: 2007-03-02 18:47:21
	Subject: Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning