Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> On 2007-03-02, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think these are actual bugs. If you happened to provide a large enough datum
>> to the gist code it would cause the same problem I'm seeing. The packed
>> varlena patch just makes it easier to trigger.
> Are you taking into account the fact that, at least prior to your patch,
> values in index tuples could never be toasted?
False --- see index_form_tuple().
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-03-02 18:51:32|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump? |
|Previous:||From: Bruno Wolff III||Date: 2007-03-02 18:47:21|
|Subject: Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning|