From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
Date: | 2008-07-23 15:05:35 |
Message-ID: | 15378.1216825535@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
> So, may be we just move insertcleanup call to ginbulkdelete/ginvacuumcleanup
> but leave aminsertcleanup field in pg_proc for a future.
I'd be inclined not to add the extra AM call if we aren't going to use
it now. There's no very good reason to think that a definition we
settled on today would be exactly the right thing for whatever future
need might appear. Better to wait till we have a concrete example to
design around.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-07-23 15:13:11 | Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 15:01:29 | Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 16:05:36 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 14:59:20 | Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |