Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Maybe. But if that's the approach we want to use, let's just call it
>> pg_erand48 in the code, and dispense with the alias macros as well as
>> all vestiges of configure support.
> Works for me. Just to confirm, that means we'd also change GEQO to
> use pg_erand48().
Right, that's what I was thinking.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2011-08-03 13:30:37|
|Subject: Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings|
|Previous:||From: Petro Meier||Date: 2011-08-03 13:19:06|
|Subject: PQescapeByteaConn - returns wrong string for PG9.1 Beta3|