"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> This patch *replaces* the previous one. Contains the exact same changes,
> except it *also* contains the move of the backend parameter file to
> shared memory on win32.
I think it's way too late in the beta cycle for significant changes in
the fork mechanism ... especially if the gain is only 10% on something
that isn't a performance issue for properly written applications anyway.
Can I safely ignore this patch and use the prior one, or are there
additional bug fixes in this?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-16 19:52:55|
|Subject: Re: [PORTS] Windows XP could not get token information: 122 |
|Previous:||From: Guillaume LELARGE||Date: 2004-11-16 10:02:44|
|Subject: Updated french translations for 8.0|