Re: TODO updates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO updates
Date: 2000-07-24 03:50:13
Message-ID: 15304.964410613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Do you mean that by putting the ACLs at the end I may be allowing access
> (via the rule parser) that is inappropriate?

I'm more worried about failing to allow access that's necessary to do
the restore. What about

\connect - user1

create table t1;

\connect - user2

create rule .... (refers to t1)

I think the create rule will fail if you haven't yet granted user2
access rights for t1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-24 04:05:37 Re: TODO updates
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-24 03:35:13 Re: TODO updates