Tom Lane writes:
> I'm especially not pleased at the notion of removing an error check
> that's always been there because someone else thinks that would make it
> more convenient for his application.
Please, don't get me wrong - I don't want to come across arrogant. I'm
simply trying to improve the 'COPY FROM' command in a situation where
speed is a critical issue and the data is dirty... And that must be a
relatively common scenario in industry.
And I never said the duplicate should be silently ignored - an
elog(NOTICE) should still be output.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Swan||Date: 2001-10-01 14:21:22|
|Subject: Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates?|
|Previous:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2001-10-01 14:12:09|
|Subject: Re: Moving CVS files around?|