| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling |
| Date: | 2009-09-27 03:43:42 |
| Message-ID: | 15238.1254023022@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> writes:
> Hum, why is PG doing an (unchecked) atoi on the user specified port
> rather than leaving it up to getaddrinfo to resolve the port? It would
> seem to require changing UNIXSOCK_PATH to accept a string as the "port
> number", which is probably a bit much of a change.
> The included doesn't feel very nice, but is probably more acceptable.
Applied, thanks.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-27 04:41:47 | Re: Idle processes chewing up CPU? |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-09-27 03:18:56 | Re: psql: FATAL: role "postgres" does not exist |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-27 03:44:02 | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-27 03:29:06 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Unicode escapes in E'...' strings Author: Marko Kreen |