Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Tilmann Singer <tils(at)tils(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?
Date: 2009-07-16 04:15:12
Message-ID: 15194.1247717712@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The most effective solution might be to revert the change in pg_migrator
>> and instead have pg_dump interpret --binary-upgrade --schema-only to
>> include the data for sequences. It seems ugly as sin though :-(

> Uh, how is this going to behave in 8.5? Do we still dump sequences, and
> if so, aren't we heading down the road of dumping stuff only because a
> previous release needed it?

In 8.5 we'll probably have it go over to treating sequences the same as
other user tables. What, do you think that'll be the only change
required in pg_migrator's behavior between 8.4 and 8.5? I think it'll
more likely be down in the noise ...

> Can we run a query that just shifts columns around in the sequence heap
> files we migrated?

Nope. That's not exposed at the SQL level, even if we allowed ALTER
TABLE on sequences (which I sure hope we don't).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-16 04:16:23 Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-07-16 04:13:14 Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-16 04:16:23 Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-07-16 04:15:03 Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/lite rev.2163