Re: search.postgresql.org

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: search.postgresql.org
Date: 2006-03-25 06:07:55
Message-ID: 15170.1143266875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I was looking at our search configuration and I noted that out of a
> weight of 100 we are only weighing archives at 50 and varlena at 25.
> That seems a little low as archives is the primary source of pratical
> and real world issues and varlena is a great resource.

Um, what other resources are rated higher? If you'll pardon my
ignorance, what other resources is the search engine considering at all?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-03-25 06:24:45 Re: search.postgresql.org
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-03-25 05:57:23 search.postgresql.org