Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: shared_buffers advice

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pierre C <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul McGarry <paul(at)paulmcgarry(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
Date: 2010-03-16 21:39:26
Message-ID: 15102.1268775566@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe it would make more sense to try to reorder the fsync calls
> instead.

Reorder to what, though?  You still have the problem that we don't know
much about the physical layout on-disk.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-03-16 21:49:03
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-03-16 21:30:54
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group