Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On fre, 2011-09-02 at 11:01 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> What about logging it with a lower level, e.g. NOTICE instead of the
>> current LOG? If that's not a solution then a new GUC is needed I
> Changing the log level is not the appropriate solution. Make it a
> configuration parameter.
Frankly, logging as verbose as this is proposed to be is something
that I can't imagine anybody wanting at all, especially not in
production environments. DEBUG3 or somewhere around there seems fine.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-09-02 14:34:34|
|Subject: Re: postgresql.conf archive_command example|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2011-09-02 13:44:42|
|Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress|