Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Date: 2011-09-02 14:13:19
Message-ID: 15092.1314972799@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On fre, 2011-09-02 at 11:01 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> What about logging it with a lower level, e.g. NOTICE instead of the
>> current LOG? If that's not a solution then a new GUC is needed I
>> guess.

> Changing the log level is not the appropriate solution.  Make it a
> configuration parameter.

Frankly, logging as verbose as this is proposed to be is something
that I can't imagine anybody wanting at all, especially not in
production environments.  DEBUG3 or somewhere around there seems fine.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-09-02 14:34:34
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf archive_command example
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-02 13:44:42
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group