Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug #610: collation fails sorting because of strcoll() bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mgruber(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #610: collation fails sorting because of strcoll() bug
Date: 2002-03-07 21:21:43
Message-ID: 15085.1015536103@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org writes:
> collation fails sorting because of strcoll() bug

Sorry, strcoll() is behaving as defined.  If you don't like it, use
a different LOCALE.  Or at the very least, complain to the strcoll
authors, not us ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-08 01:09:19
Subject: Re: libpq not reentrant
Previous:From: pgsql-bugsDate: 2002-03-07 19:36:16
Subject: Bug #610: collation fails sorting because of strcoll() bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group